• Home
  • Schedule
  • Pricing
  • Utah CFP
  • Real Estate Agent Safety
  • CCHD
  • Blog
  • Women's Handgun
  • Countering the Mass Shooter
  • Contact
PATRIOT CARRY
  • Home
  • Schedule
  • Pricing
  • Utah CFP
  • Real Estate Agent Safety
  • CCHD
  • Blog
  • Women's Handgun
  • Countering the Mass Shooter
  • Contact

Patriot Carry Blog

​“No Weapons Allowed”

7/21/2025

0 Comments

 
 
I needed to get an updated DoD ID card at a time when the need was more immediate than my normal source could support since it was booked beyond my needed time frame. This led me to seek other options. The one I found was through a special arrangement between the program management office and the issuing agency. Off I went on my adventure to a federal building.
 
This building housed several government agencies along with the Navy administration office that would issue my ID card. I knew that I couldn’t take my carry pistol with me. I left it in my truck with my pocketknife. When I got into the lobby, I saw metal detectors and an x-ray machine. I put the contents of my pockets in the tub and proceeded through the metal detector. When the tub got on the other side the guard reached in and pulled out my wallet and keys.
 
I had a credit card knife in my wallet. I had forgotten it was there. My keys had a gadget on them that was a multi-tool. On one side it has a small knife tip that is ½ inch long. The guard looked at me and said “Sir, you cannot bring dangerous weapons in the building. You have to take these back to your car.” I looked at the knife tip, then looked at him, totally flabbergasted. I had never considered that tiny, very dull, knife tip to be a dangerous weapon. I said, “I can put my keys between my fingers and use them as a weapon.” His response was a deadpan, “Then leave them in your car too.”
 
I looked down and saw that heavy grey tub with its thick plastic walls, then over to my right where the velvet rope stanchion was also in arms reach. I started to point out that these two improvised weapons were more dangerous than the gadget on my keys. When I looked back at him good sense took over. I could not reason with this guy, and I really needed the ID card. I went back to my truck and downloaded any “dangerous” metal I had on my person. I got my ID card, but I also started thinking.
 
What is the real dangerous weapon? We are entertained by shows such as MacGyver, James Bond, Mission Impossible, and characters like Reacher and Jack Ryan. These shows are all fantasy. However, there is a concept behind them that applies to more than just the special forces and black ops operators; the ability to use improvised weapons.
 
One definition of weapon is: A weapon, arm or armament is any implement or device that can be used with intent to inflict damage or harm. (per Wikipedia) That means my observation about the tub or stanchion is correct, when intent is included. Intent is the key that most people discount. The gun free zones completely ignore intent.
 
History, when examined honestly, is packed with mass killings, many of which do not involve firearms. The most people killed in an attack on a school was in 1927 and the perpetrator used explosives. That day 45 people were killed and another 58 injured. Knife attacks in Japan and China are just as horrific as the mass killings in the United States, which also include knife attacks.
 
My point is that a bad actor, intent on hurting as many people as possible will find a tool that will get the job done. That could be as simple as a box cutter.
 
When I see the “No Dangerous Weapons Allowed” signs I look around. There are normally many objects within reach that can be used to “inflict damage or do harm” if someone has intent. This is not intended to be a political stance, even though those signs are motivated more by politics than safety.
 
I saw a cartoon in the early 70’s showing a man surrounded by a circle of men with firearms pointed out. The message was that this was the only way to be protected from terrorism.  I think this concept applies to protecting from bad actors with intent to hurt people.
 
I went to a craft show labeled as “Stranger Things.” Our daughter likes the macabre so it seemed like an event she would enjoy. The event had one of those signs at every entrance. I saw a police officer and told her that I felt that if they were going to make sure I could not defend myself the venue should incur some liability if an attacked happened. She said she agreed, but knowing we had to be disarmed to go inside we could choose to not enter. OK, she had a point.
 
My point is there are areas where our everyday carry may have to be curtailed to a tactical pen. That doesn’t mean we are forbidden from using any object in the environment as an improvised weapon.
 
We should get to the point where we are the weapon, not what we carry. When we are threatened with force from a bad actor, we should consider ourselves as the third monkey on the ramp to Noah’s ark and the rain has started. There are no rules in a fight for survival. Dirty tricks only apply to organized contests with formal rules. All tools at our disposal that assist us in our survival or survival of those we are endeavoring to protect are fair game. This includes the metal sign stanchion holding that “No Weapons Allowed” sign.
 
When we are out and about in public our situational awareness should include what tools are available in addition to potential escape routes and threats. That shouldn’t be paranoia, it should be our normal.
 
In training for mass shooter events, we are all taught Run – Hide – Fight. In the fight segment of that training we are taught to throw whatever we have available such as a desktop stapler or coffee mug. Any resistance increases the probability of survival. Pay attention to what you have around you so you are the weapon.
 
 
0 Comments

Less Than Lethal Self-Defense

7/16/2025

0 Comments

 

There are some locations that prevent the use of deadly force. There are also people who do not want to use deadly force. In those cases, potential threats can still be mitigated. There are less than lethal tools that can be employed.

Let’s start by identifying some assumptions about criminals. I know, assumptions are dangerous and not always accurate. Work with me for a little bit. My first assumption is that criminals are inherently lazy. They want an easy mark. My next one is that criminals don’t like witnesses. These two characteristics can help an intended victim use non-lethal methods to thwart the attack.

Noise

Women’s self-defense classes teach their students to make as much noise they can by yelling and screaming. There are other devices that can fill this need without straining the vocal cords or being stopped by a hand over the victim’s mouth.

 Personal Alarms: There are personal alarms that can be activated by pulling a lanyard. Once they are activated it emits a 130 – 140 decibel alarm that can’t be silenced easily. They can be purchased for $9 to $30.

 Whistles – Everyone has heard of rape whistles. There are a variety of whistles (not labeled as rape whistles) that can emit a 120 – 150 decibel sound. Obviously, a hand over the mouth can be an issue with a whistle. I carry a whistle can that is part of a tactical pen. Whistles can be a lifesaver in survival situations also. Screaming for help is short term before the vocal cords fail. Whilstles can be purchased for $3-5.

Noise defense tools are the least likely to trip up your defense if an overzealous prosecutor wants to pursue charges.

Let’s look at other tools.

Lights

Flashlights can be a good next level of defense. I’m not talking about your two C or D cell incandescent light. Technology has advanced to provide several hundred lumens of light in a compact package. An additional feature beyond your youth camping flashlight is the ability for a razzle-dazzle light that is very disorienting.

Some of them have other features such as DNA collection sharp points, glass breakers and stun guns. Some are large enough to serve as a club.

While a light won’t take down an attacker it will give the victim an opportunity to run away while the attacker is temporarily blinded.

Sprays

There are two agents that are commonly used. OC and an OC/CS combination.

- OC Spray

OC spray is more commonly known as pepper spray. It contains the active ingredient oleoresin capsicum. When shopping for OC spray you will find different levels of OC from 2-10%. The higher the percentage the more ‘heat’ in the spray. Some may also contain UV dye to aid in prosecution.

OC spray can be a stream, gel or mist. The stream or gel sprays are intended to be sprayed directly in the eyes and face of the attacker. The mist is intended to place a cloud of the OC agent between you and the attacker, which acts as a type of barrier to facilitate escape.

- OC/CS Spray

OC/CS combination includes a lachrymatory agent, the active ingredient in tear gas. While OC spray is legal just about anywhere (as always check your state and local codes, it may not be legal in CA and NY) the addition of the CS component is not. Byrna (discussed later) reports that they cannot ship their OC/CS projectiles to NY, WI, MI, CA, or MN. I suspect that this combination is not legal in those states.

Deploying OC spray can be problematic. First, if you are not upwind you can become an unintended recipient. Next, deploying it in tight spaces can involve many unintended recipients. In addition to involving more people it may be against local ordinances to deploy pepper spray in enclosed environments.
OC spray may not be effective on all people. That is why some people (myself included) carry the OC/CS spray.

No one is immune from CS spray. It does cause extreme tearing in the eyes and breathing problems. My first experience with CS was in the military chemical warfare training. The second time was when I was discharging an expired container. More on that later.

While CS is very effective it has some dark characteristics. The spray has particles that do not evaporate, they persist. This is one of the characteristics that makes it more effective. The dark side of these particles is that they get in clothing and on surfaces. CS is a dirty spray. When deployed the areas affected have to be cleaned to ensure the particulates are removed. This is why prisons don’t use it for inmate control. We were taught by the military to go home and immediately get undressed and throw our clothes in the wash after our training. Otherwise, our unsuspecting significant other could get a dose of the tearing particulates.

Both OC and OC/CS sprays have expiration dates. I don’t think the contents expire but there is no pressure gage on the containers. After a while the pressure may slowly bleed off. By replacing the spray when it expires you are more assured to have pressure to get the job done.

C02 Pistols

There are several kinds of paintball projectile pistols. These .40 caliber C02 pistols can be loaded with rubber balls or chemical agents. Byrna (https://byrna.com/) sells several pistol and rifle variants as well as three types of projectiles. They have an OC projectile and an OC/CS projectile. Since these are not considered firearms there is no background check to purchase them. They are just one source.

These C02 pistols do not look like paintball guns with the huge hopper on top. They have magazines that hold the projectiles. The projectiles can contain paint or OC. They can be used to do training or for self-defense.

Energy Weapons

- Stun Devices

There are many forms of a stun device. I have seen them in rings, flashlights, and personal defense. These devices require direct contact to the attacker. While contact on skin is optimal it is possible to deliver an effective shock through light clothing. Another aspect to these devices is the psychological impact of hearing the snapping of the high voltage jumping across the terminals.

These devices require the attacker to be dissuaded from further attack. The pain and muscle lock up are temporary. While extremely painful and debilitating the effect temporary and doesn’t normally cause damage.

- TASER

Like the previously discussed stun devices the TASER causes extreme pain and neuromuscular incapacitation. The difference is the TASER fires two projectiles about 15 feet that embed themselves in the attacker. Like the stun devices it is more effective embedded in skin but will still work if the barbs are within 1 inch of the skin. The TASER cycles 19 times per second for 30 seconds. This is sufficient to make a quick escape.

There are many more tools that can be employed. One is a tactical pen. Comment with your favorite.
0 Comments

​Defensive Gun Use Frequency

7/12/2025

0 Comments

 

I’m not interested in being political. I am interested in truth and reality. I am firmly convinced that neither truth nor reality are portrayed in the media, except by accident. I have tried to teach my family to look critically at what they hear and see in their various information sources.

With that being said, let’s look at what a defensive gun use, it is likely the first thought that comes to mind is shooting someone in self-defense. While that is definitely a defensive gun use it isn’t the only kind. It is possible that a threat can be dissuaded by merely announcing the possession of a gun. It is also possible that the treat is mitigated by drawing the firearm without pointing it at the threat. Pointing your firearm at the threat does require pressing the trigger, but will be a strong motivator to disengage the attack.

As you can see there is a spectrum of possible responses to a threat that does not include discharging and injuring or killing the threat. Unfortunately, the defensive gun use we hear about in the various media sources are narrowed down to someone using a gun and shooting an attacker.  It gets more coverage when the attempt to stop the attacker results in an innocent bystander getting injured or killed.

The media doesn’t cover the many times a crime in progress is terminated or a crime prevented altogether. This might be to avoid weakening their agenda. But that is not the only reason we don’t hear about them.

The biggest reason is that when the mere presence of a firearm prevents a crime, such as a mugging, the victim usually doesn’t report it to law enforcement. This might be due to a very miniscule possibility that the crime would be investigated and even smaller possibility the perpetrator would be prosecuted. It is more likely the potential victim is relieved to have survived the encounter and goes on with their intended activity.

How do we know how many times an armed citizen protects themselves? One type of source are the various gun magazines such as Concealed Carry, from the USCCA, or Shooting Illustrated by the NRA to name two. These magazines have a feature that lists times an armed citizen defends themselves. If one does the math, the 12 or so listed in the July Concealed Carry could equate to 144 times reported by that one magazine alone. The June Shooting Illustrated lists only 7. If that is consistent then we could add another 84 times giving a total reported through those two magazines as 228 times

These are only two sources, and my math may not be correct since I took a snapshot of two issues. There are more firearms magazines being distributed. Those are the two I get. With just those two sources there are more than 200 times a year that guns are used in self defense.

What is the real number? How many times are guns used in self defense? On 10 December 2020, the American Journal of Criminal Justice published an article: What Do CDC’s Surveys Say About the Prevalence of Defensive Gun Use?  (https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09562-0)
 
The plurality of survey indicates the CDC did many surveys, 21 to be exact. The surveys were taken over a three-year period from 1996 – 1998. The raw numbers were weighted to adjust the sample population numbers to reflect total population of gun owners. I am not a statistician and cannot explain or defend their numbers. Like you, I am accepting them at face value.
 
Here is where it gets interesting. We are starting with the idea that the numbers reported by the two referenced magazines were in the neighborhood of 220 times a year. The CDC numbers are significantly higher. To quote the report “There is currently no feasible way to measure the prevalence of DGU other than with surveys. Certainly police data cannot provide meaningful estimates given the unwillingness of most crime victims to even report their victimizations to the police (Hart & Rennison, 2003), never mind the controversial fact that they had threatened or attacked another person with a firearm during the crime event.”
 
Surveys rely upon accurate reporting by the participants. As such the skeptic can dismiss the results altogether. I know if my primary care physician asks me if I have firearms in my home, he will get a ‘none of your business’ answer or an evocation of my 5th amendment rights. Let’s get to the CDC numbers now.  
 
- 1996 the weighted total cases were 5,336,378
- 1997 the weighted total cases were 5,835,973
- 1998 the weighted total cases were 5,869,842
 
That is an average of 5.6 million times a year that a gun owner is reporting using a firearm in self-defense! Since those surveys were taken there has been an explosion of new gun purchases. In 2000 there were 8 million NICS checks. They peaked at 39 million in 2020 and dropped to 31 million in 2022. There were more than 22 million concealed carry permit holders by August of 2023. It is reasonable to believe the number of defensive gun uses have gone up also. However, violent crime has dropped over the period between 2000 and 2019. We must keep in mind that the crimes numbers don’t include those instances where a crime was stopped or prevented, but not reported.
​
I have heard a range of 500,00 to 3,000,000 quoted. We know that it is difficult to know the real number for the many factors already mentioned. That does not dismiss the reality that firearms are used many more times to stop a crime and save a life than they are to take a life.
0 Comments

S&W, Glock, Kimber?

7/11/2025

0 Comments

 


Everybody has a favorite. Some will defend their choice of brand passionately. But, what is a neophyte looking for a first purchase supposed to do?

Often a sincere search for what brand/caliber to choose meets the passionate brand loyal person and the many options are quickly narrowed down to one brand and possibly caliber. While this serves to bolster the opinion and belief of the passionately loyal person but it may be a serious disservice to the neophyte.
When someone is learning to shoot for the first time it should be approached from a crawl-walk-run perspective.

While the neophyte may graduate into a IDPA, three gun, or speed shooting competitor, they need to start somewhere short of the end goal. They must first learn the basics. While a $1,500 pistol would certainly facilitate learning the basics, is the neophyte be best served with that choice?

I believe a better solution is to befriend someone who has a variety of brands and calibers and is willing to take a neophyte on to teach the basics and see what brand/caliber best suits the needs at the time.
There are many basic pistol classes available from organizations such as the NRA and USCCA. Another viable option is to go to a range that rents firearms. Often, they have instructors on staff.

Trying different firearms can help a new shooter learn not only how they feel to shoot but also how well they can manage the recoil. A beginner may start off purchasing a ‘starter’ gun. One that is possibly a .22 or .380 caliber to learn with. Then as they become proficient and confident look for a new one as their needs and interest grow.

Can a $250.00 firearm be good enough? That depends on the shooter. If the shooter is only interested in occasionally plinking or shooting paper targets at the range, it could. If the shooter expects the firearm to be used for self-protection, maybe not. If the shooter expects to enter competitions, definitely not.

The new enthusiast should start with training. I was at a gun counter once when a potential gun purchase was thwarted by the lack of a FOID card (yes, Illinois) but the person at the counter was counseling the guy to get some training.

It is best to start with a small caliber first. That will get the basics down without the intimidation of the recoil. Once the new shooter is comfortable move up in caliber. How far to move up is determined by the goal.

A contestant in the IDPA matches can certainly use a .45 or 10mm but it is prudent to use something like a 9mm for better recoil management. A .45 or 10mm can be used for concealed carry and self-defense. However the potential for over-penetration may make the 10mm a less desirable option.

Bella Twin may have killed a Grizzley bear with a .22 but it her only option at the time and she wasn’t bear hunting. Someone who hikes and camps in areas with large predators should probably consider a larger caliber.

I haven’t addressed brands at all. This is on purpose. S&W, Springfield, Kimber and Glock all make fine firearms. Brands are just as personal as the choice of cars. Although, I don’t believe gun manufacturers produce a lemon from a line of firearms unlike the auto industry. Like the auto industry there are passionate proponents of their favorites. Let the new shooter try the waters and find what brand/model/caliber works for them.
0 Comments

​Shooting Stance

7/10/2025

0 Comments

 

For 40 years police departments trained their officers in the Weaver stance. When videos of officers in firefights revealed the stance was dropped.

They transitioned to the isosceles stance instead. This stance gives the shooter a stable platform and 200 degrees of swing without moving their feet.

I have had some students draw and get into a crouch before firing. This is how that student was taught to shoot. The problem is it took him two seconds to get into the crouch. We were doing concealed draw and fire training for a self defense event. 

The Weaver stance has been around a long time. Many shooters were trained to use that stance and continue to use it today. That is the law of primacy, what is learned first sticks. It is tough to retrain yourself after years of doing something a particular way.

Weaver or isosceles doesn’t really matter when doing marksmanship shooting. Both are effective. However, self defense shooting is different. 

Self defense events are quick. Your favorites stance may not be practical, or possible. You have to be trained and prepared to shoot from where the event presents itself.
0 Comments

​Personal & Home Protection Plan

7/8/2025

0 Comments

 

Consider your personal circumstances when thinking about the need for a personal and home protection plan. Most people take concealed carry training thinking solely about physical protection. Self-protection is a much broader subject.

Physical - Self-protection certainly starts with physical protection. You must be proficient with the defensive tools you have readily available. This could be every day carry items, or staged items in your office, home or vehicle. You must also be in a situational awareness condition yellow. That means you are aware of your surroundings and potential threats.

 Legal – Knowing the rules for the legal use of force will prevent going to prison after surviving a self-defense event. You need to make sure all five elements for the use of deadly force are met before you employ that level of force. A prosecutor only needs to trip you up on one of the five to get a conviction. Knowing and following the law is essential to staying out of prison.

Financial – Even if you have done everything right there is a high probability you will be charged with a crime and end up in court. Posting bail takes money. Your defense requires a lawyer. The lawyer should do their own investigation. Your defense may also require expert testimony that is never free. A successful defense can cost several hundred thousand dollars. You need self-defense insurance to protect yourself from this financial crisis.

Moral – Shooting another person can come with some serious remorse and feelings of guilt. By being properly trained and following that training you know you have done everything you could to avoid the violent encounter. You were left with no other choice than deadly force.

These four aspects apply to any self-defense situation. Being out in public verses being in your home present different considerations.

You have more resources and options in your home. You can prepare in advance with some simple preparations.
The first is change the 3/8 inch screws in your entry doors with 3-inch screws. This makes the door much more difficult to break down. Most home break-ins are through the front door. This simple step can be enough to dissuade a home invasion.

Trim bushes back to expose the windows. A burglar can use the cover of landscaping to break in through a window. Trimming the bushes back denies the cover.

Install motion sensor lighting. A light coming on can be very effective in chasing burglars away.

You can stage firearms. A staged firearm is loaded and in battery. They are stored in locked containers to deny access to unauthorized persons. They should have their trigger guard covered to prevent a hurried recovery causing an inadvertent discharge.

You should create and discuss an emergency response plan with those that live in the home. Designate gathering points in the home and rooms to use as safe rooms. Those rooms should have sturdy lockable doors.
​
There is much more that can be done to prepare yourself for personal and home defense. Attend a quality training program such as the USCCA Concealed Carry and Home Defense class.
0 Comments

Eye Dominance

7/7/2025

0 Comments

 


Experienced shooters are aware that we have a dominant eye. Instructors often do tests to help new shooters identify which eye is dominant. I have my students do some aiming drills which often exposes their dominant eye. This is when a right-handed shooter is laying their head down to be able to see the sights with their head tilted to get their left eye lined up with the sights.

I teach the usual best practices. However, I also modify what I teach when I am dealing with students that face some challenges. For example, I was qualifying a student for the Illinois Concealed Carry Permit. He was in his 70’s and had been shooting a long time. When he shot, he had his support hand tightly gripping his shooting wrist. At his age it is quite possible for him to have arthritis. While I was contemplating correcting such an obviously incorrect grip, I looked at the target. He was placing his shots in the 9 and 10 rings consistently. He was clearly proficient with this grip.

Another example is my son, who has Dwane’s syndrome. This disorder prevents his right eye from turning to the right. Instead, his eye sucks into the eye socket. His eyes are also not aligned. To get good depth perception he turns his head slightly. We were at the range shooting together. I noticed that he was cocking his head as he fired. I was just about to tell him to stop shooting so I could give him some instruction when I realized what was going on.

Both these shooters were successfully compensating for physical limitations. A cross-eye dominant shooter may be in the same situation, compensating successfully, at the range. For marksmanship in a static range situation, this may be fine.

However, there are many situations where cross-eye dominant shooting adversely affects the shooters performance, such as IDPA and Cowboy matches. My primary instruction is for self-defense. Seconds count. Accuracy counts.

The human brain, a phenomenal organ, compensates for many things without us even knowing. Everyone has a spot in their retina that has no vision receptors. That is because this is where the optic nerve attaches. The brain compensates for this ‘hole’ in our vision. If you want to see, or not see, this spot, put two dots about 3” apart on a plain piece of paper. Close one eye and stare at the dot on the right for your left eye or the left for your right eye. Move the paper in towards your face. Keep staring at the dot. You will be able to see the other dot in your peripheral vision. As the paper gets closer the other dot will disappear. You can move the paper back and forth and watch the dot come and go.

The concept of a dominant eye assumes one eye is providing your brain better information, so it takes priority over what you see. I’ve done the dominant eye test (many of them) and have had my dominant eye change from right to left and back to right again. There must be something else going on. One factor is age. As I get older my eyes are ageing also, as to be expected.

Our brains rely upon binocular vision. Our brain needs two eyes for depth perception. Even though we can demonstrate one eye is dominant, not having two sources of vision input negates depth perception.

What do we do with this information? First, we need to recognize left eye today may not be left eye tomorrow. As different physiological effects change our eyes we need to adjust our shooting. We must be able to see our sights and the threat (target) to have a good sight picture.

What if we could train our brain, build neural pathways, to have both eyes focus on the sight picture? I’m not suggesting we have one eye focus on the front sight and the other on the threat. I’m suggesting that we can train our brain to accept input from both eyes.

As a commercial driver I have to pass a DOT physical. In this physical my vision is tested three times. First each eye is tested independently. Then I am given a third test with both eyes working together. On the surface it makes sense to test both eyes together since I don’t anticipate driving with one eye closed. But in retrospect I get an Ahah! moment. Each eye on its own had unique values. Both eyes together demonstrated the synergy of binocular vision.

Many shooters shoot with one eye closed. There are training devices that occlude one eye or the other. Some instructors use tape or Vaseline over a lens in the shooters eye protection. All to help the shooter concentrate on the dominant eye.

I teach that a self-defense situation requires both eyes open to give the greatest field of vision. Closing one eye also closes off half of the peripheral vision. This prevents threat identification on that side.

There is an instructor, Mike (Ox) Ochsner, who teaches a program (https://visiontraining.com) to train the brain to focus both eyes on the same point. He uses a string with knots in it. This string is put on the shooter’s nose and the shooter focuses on beads or knots along the length of the string. The goal is to see the string in each eye leading up to the knot or bead. This gives the appearance of two strings that meet at the target knot or bead. With several beads along the string the brain can learn to keep both eyes working together.

My recommendation is to shoot with both eyes open. Test yourself often for eye dominance. Train your brain to use both eyes. This will get you on target quicker.
0 Comments

What is the best caliber for self defense?

7/6/2025

0 Comments

 


On May 19, 1953 in the wilderness of Alberta, Canada, a 63 year-old grandmother, in an act of self defense, shot a grizzly bear that was threatening her. This bear was so large it set a world record at the time.

Bella Twin, and her companion were hunting small game. Bella was an experienced hunter and trapper. She wasn’t on a guided hunt with a guide. She was just in the wrong place when the grizzly came along. The pair had no intentions to hunt a bear, much less a trophy grizzly bear.

This is not dramatically (OK, most street thugs won’t eat us) different than when we are out in public and are faced with a street thug intent on robbing us. Being in the wrong place at the wrong time can certainly put us in a situation where our only option is self-defense.

That leads me to probably the most opinionated, passionately argued, aspect of self defense, what caliber is the best to carry. I have heard that some have been told, “if you don’t carry a 9mm or larger don’t come to my class.” My first reaction to that was great I won’t be coming to your class. I carry a .45 so my choice of carry is not what garners that reaction, it’s the rigidity of that instructor’s thinking.

I have my students clear malfunctions to give them the knowledge to deal with malfunctions and ensure they can rack the slide of their selected caliber firearm. Realizing that even in the same caliber some pistols are easier to rack than others, I know it isn’t a perfect exercise. It is better than no exercise at all.

I have them try different calibers until they are comfortably able to do the tap, rack, and roll drill. My goal is for them to know how to clear a malfunction so they can deal with them if they get into a self defense situation and have a malfunction.

I have had students that can’t rack a gun larger than a .22 due to arthritis. Going back to that rigid instructor’s attitude, that student should not be armed.

What about that bear Bella Twin shot? Remember, she was hunting small game. She only had one gun with her. It was a single shot Cooey Ace rifle. That rifle was well used and had black tape holding the barrel to the cracked stock.

As stories and time progresses facts vary based upon the story teller. The rifle was chambered for .22 LR. Since there was no magazine a .22 long, or even a .22 short could be placed in the chamber. It has been reported that Bella had .22 long cartridges in her pocket the day the bear was killed. Some have said an experienced trapper wouldn’t have used the higher velocity rounds since a .22 short could have done the job. I would lend more weight to the rounds she was reported to have had in her pocket.

The big question yet to be answered is how did she kill a grizzly with a .22? She was a very experienced hunter and trapper. She knew the anatomy of game, to include a bear. It only took a single precisely placed shot to the side of the head to drop the bear in one shot. As any big game hunter knows, Bella certainly did, a dropped game animal may not be dead. It could be stunned and jump up at any moment. Bella put several more rounds in its head to make sure it wouldn’t get up.

I think Bella’s story clearly indicates a .22 cartridge is lethal, when the shot is properly placed. I firmly believe shot placement is more critical than caliber, at least in handguns. The need is to stop the attack. Stopping the attack requires, at a minimum, immobilization. When the center of mass shots are accurate the heart and lungs are affected disrupting the ability to get blood and oxygen to the brain. This will stop the ability for the threat to continue the attack, it just may not be as immediate as Bella got with the bear.

How do you choose the cartridge for you? There are several considerations.

You must be able to operate the firearm. I have a Springfield 1911 that I cannot carry. While I have no problem racking the slide or managing the recoil, I cannot eject the magazine without shifting my grip to get my stubby thumb on the release. This takes my firearm out of a firm grip and my eyes off the threat. If I have to do a mag change I have a problem. So I don’t carry that firearm.

The next consideration is managing recoil. If I cannot control the recoil and get back on target quickly, I only have one shot, it had better be a good one. I need to keep on target so I can deliver multiple rounds quickly.

I was at a range in Illinois doing some instruction. As my students were getting ready, we heard what seemed like a cannon go off at the opposite end of the range. I looked down and saw a man with a sizeable handgun (.454 Casull) sitting in a rest. He was massaging his right wrist. He shot several times while we were there. Each time it was boom, put the gun down, massage the wrist. That is not a carry gun, unless the psychological effect negated the need for multiple shots.

Then consider size and concealability. Your carry gun can be any size you choose. If you can conceal a full frame handgun and are comfortable with the weight, then carry it. Some also want only a double-stack magazine. This increases the available number of rounds and also adds weight and grip size. Most people opt for some level of downsizing to a compact or even a pocket pistol. Downsizing affects the barrel length. As the barrel length goes down, so does muzzle velocity.

The answer to what is the perfect concealed carry round can only be answered by you. What is perfect for me may be unacceptable for you. Remember that as the energy delivered drops accuracy becomes more critical. Choose a round and handgun that fits you. If you scoffed at the story of the man shooting a .454 Casull and can not only conceal but also manage the recoil then good for you, carry it. If you can’t rack the slide of a .380 and need to drop down to a .22, then make each shot deadly accurate.
0 Comments

​Independence Day

7/4/2025

0 Comments

 

Today we celebrate our nations independence from British rule. This independence was made possible by citizen-soldiers that brought their own firearms and ammunition.

Those same firearms and ammunition were perceived as a threat by the British, who made an unsuccessful attempt to confiscate them. Those firearms were in the possession of the people as tools to obtain food and as weapons to defend families against various threats from wildlife to hostile natives to the criminal element.

Times were different then. Those firearms were tools that were as critical to survival as the horses and plows they used to plant their crops or the axe they used to harvest lumber. They were a normal part of everyday life.

As part of everyday life their owners were proficient in their use. They were single shot arms that had to be reloaded by assembling the components; powder, patch and ball, then percussion cap or frizzen pan charging. A hunter often only had one chance to harvest game before it ran off. Many hunters knew making that one shot count meant eating meat that night or not.

As our nation grew our society changed. We moved from rural areas to cities as manufacturing was replacing farming. Hunting became less of a necessity and more of a hobby. Firearms also became less of a necessity.
Then our nation became contentious and tensions rose to the point that a civil war broke out. As people were drafted to support the war it became evident that our societal evolution had a hidden consequence, marksmanship had dropped off.

This led to the birth of the NRA in New York and the range at Creedmore. The primary purpose was marksmanship. Youth marksmanship programs began shooting. Schools had firearms training and gun ranges.
One could look at that as a clandestine plot by the government to make sure the next military draft got people who could accurately shoot a rifle as they showed up for service.

This same principle is why the FCC protects the amateur radio frequency bands. The nation, actually the world, has amateur radio operators who pay for, and maintain, radio equipment that they eagerly operate in disciplined networks during emergencies. The world has an emergency communications network paid for by the unpaid volunteers who will operate that network.

Fast forward to today.

Our world has drastically changed from the days of hunting to survive. Its population has exploded. Urban areas have spread so far that the distinction between one city to be next is only discerned by sineage. People are crammed into high density housing.

Gone are the days when the community came together to build homes and barns for their neighbors. The neighbor helping neighbor has been replaced by government welfare as poverty has increased. Along with increased poverty come increased violence.

Firearms have a different purpose today. Rather than being used to acquire food and defend against animal predators they are for defense against criminals.

Some in our world believe the need for firearms has long passed. Unfortunately, the criminal elements in our world will always have firearms. Our failure to stop alchohol during prohibition and drugs today expose the inability to effectively prohibit anything.

There is one aspect of our great nation that makes us unique. It wasn’t formed by one nations conquest of another. It was formed by the people who took up arms against an oppressive government. The citizens fought for self rule. They formed independent states that joined together to make what we now recognize as The United States of America.

They wrote a bill of rights and constitution that clearly indicate this nation is “by the people and for the people” sending a message that its citizens are not and will never become subjects.

It is this concept that has driven the protection of the 2nd amendment. It is this concept that drives the protection of our right to own any number or type of firearm we want. I know people who own cannons, tanks and so on.

We have people who have the resolve to take up arms against the government. In recent past ranchers stood against armed BLM agents over cattle grazing rights proving it is possible to do as the founding fathers said.
​
As we watch the parades and fireworks we should contemplate the sacrifice of those who came before us. We must also recognize the example they set for us and the responsibility laid at our feet.
0 Comments

​Dry Fire Practice – Shot Tracking

7/3/2025

0 Comments

 

Those who shoot firearms get a thrill from the noise, the smoke and for some even the recoil. The pinnacle of the shooting experience is hitting the intended target. Most of us know the thrill of hitting and seeing a glass bottle give us the feedback of an accurate shot. As we grew, we may have started hunting. The thrill of the glass breaking was replaced by an accurate shot that minimized the suffering of the harvest. We may have taken up skeet or trap shooting where the reward was and exploded clay. Or, maybe we gained a love for the sound of projectile hitting the steel targets.

My posts are from the perspective of self-defense. Here the reward of a successful deployment of your firearm is your bodily fluids remain in your body, and you survive another day.  From this perspective the dry fire practice with a laser cartridge or pistol only rewards us with a microsecond duration red dot on the target. Then it is your memory that reinforces being accurate or not.

There are better solutions. I’m not saying your memory isn’t trustworthy, just that there are many solutions that will track that red dot for you.

The simplest and cheapest (as in free) are smartphone apps. They use your phone camera to track where the dot lands. Pew Pew Tactical did a review (https://www.pewpewtactical.com/best-laser-training-apps/) on several laser training apps.

I have several starting with iTarget.

iTarget (https://www.itargetpro.com/) from Train Smart Inc. not only tracks your shots it tracks your progress. The basic version tracks and reports shots on a target.  After each round the target is saved for review. There are two more modules that can be purchased and several other training tools on their web site.
laserHIT (https://www.laserhit.com/) , like iTarget tracks your shots and saves the results for analysis. It has several modes with the ability to train from 10 to 100 yards and out to 1600 yards using a scaled target. Two modes are in the free version, Free Target Practice and Black Steel Practice. Other tools such as Top Score and Quick hit require a purchase.

Strikeman (https://www.strikeman.io/) is an app that is part a training system. While the app is free to download it is part of the Strikeman system and looks for their target for calibration. However, any target can be used. This is a comprehensive tool that allows for many training scenarios and competition.

In addition to those, mostly free, apps I use Lasr X (https://www.lasrapp.com/) which is a comprehensive training system. It uses a camera on your phone, tablet or laptop to view the target area. The system can run various drills to include competition with others. They have targets (additional purchase) that can give you the opportunity to do drills in your home that simulate action shooting with multiple targets at multiple distances. It also does analysis to help the shooter recognize muzzle movement during firing.
​
Any of these tools can give you feedback on how well you are employing your training and where you need improvement. Dry fire does not replace live fire training. However, it can help us ‘sharpen the saw’ without breaking the bank in ammunition and range costs.
 
 

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Author

    I am an Air Force Combat Veteran, Certified by the NRA and USCCA as well as the state of Utah.

    Archives

    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    November 2022

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

What Our Students Have Said

The class was excelent! Very informative and hands on. I really recomend this course; it was simple and easy!
​- Jose 
F

Contact Us

    Subscribe Today!

Submit
  • Home
  • Schedule
  • Pricing
  • Utah CFP
  • Real Estate Agent Safety
  • CCHD
  • Blog
  • Women's Handgun
  • Countering the Mass Shooter
  • Contact